Bug in Lunar Eclipse Program between 2000BC and 1000AD

Bug #1495056 reported by Alexander Wolf
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Stellarium
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Original topic: https://sourceforge.net/p/stellarium/discussion/278769/thread/ad20da89/

Message #1: Total Lunar Eclipse Date UTC Difference @ Max Eclipse Stellarium vs. NASA tabulated data (standard)

-1997 6-May -13
-1798 22-Aug -11.5
-1599 14-Jun -10
-1397 3-Feb -9
-1198 23-May -8
-999 14-Mar -7
-796 17-Apr -6
-597 9-Feb -5
-399 1-Dec -4
-199 20-Mar -3
3 4-May -3
199 21-Oct -2
400 17-Dec -2
600 28-Sep -1
799 21-Jul -1
900 13-Aug -1
951 23-May -0.5
-----------------------
998 6-Nov 0
1200 22-Dec 0
1251 1-Oct 0
1298 21-Sep 0
1400 3-Oct 0
1599 6-Aug 0
1798 29-May 0
2000 16-Jul 0
2015 28-Sep 0
2199 2-Nov 0

Message #2: Originally I was looking at lunar eclipses between 25 AD and 35 AD (Jesus's Death) for additional correlations. I found that there was a (3 hour difference) between the UTC time for maximum lunar eclipse and what the latest version of Stellarium predicts.

I then wondered how pervasive the error was. I also remember fainty that in the last 1-2 years there was a similar issue with a time offset that was corrected for the 2014 and 2015 lunar eclipses.

In short, I sampled the nearest total lunar eclipese every 200 years starting in 2000BC through 2015 AD and was happy to find that for the years 1000AD-Future, the lunar eclipses agree perfectely with the NASA tabultated values for maximum solar eclipse time (UTC).

As this thread title notes, there seems to be a slow degredation in the simulated stellarium times versus the NASA tabulated values in the years 2000BC and 1000AD.

I listed the approximate number of hours difference, finding that the error continously increased as more years passed from near 0 hours (UTC) in 1000AD to -13 hours (UTC in 2000 BC).

Message #3: The Total Lunar Eclipses checked can be found at this link to the NASA website's Lunar eclipses from 2000BC to 3000AD.
http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/LEcat5/LEcatalog.html

tags: added: archaeoastronomy
Changed in stellarium:
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
gzotti (georg-zotti) wrote :

Dear anonymous (poster of SF report),

which times do you compare?

NASA/Espenak (The URL you gave) lists TD of greatest eclipse. If you switch off DeltaT correction (Config/Navigation), your "time panel time" minus zone offset is used as TD.

-1997-05-06 is shown at mid-eclipse around 18:09 (TD) then. Offset against Espenak is less than 1 hour, which is not perfect, but not as dramatic. Reason may well be the different models implemented by Mr. Espenak and Stellarium. As always, there is still room for improvement.

Changed in stellarium:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
gzotti (georg-zotti) wrote :

Seems solved. Misunderstanding...

Changed in stellarium:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
milestone: none → 0.14.0
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.