Hi,
 
what do you mean with "clean installation"? I downloaded it from
CHIP ONLINE source, regularly a very trustfully source without viruses or  
similar.
 
Correction of light speed is only important when working with moons of  
planets for example or eclipsing events with sun or moon. Time delay is only  
about 15 minutes regarding temporary distances of those three minor planets, 
so  it is nearly no difference in position with or without correction of 
light  speed, comparing with an observed real difference of about 2-5 days.
 
I checked no absolute coordinates, only relative positions against star  
constellation when
comparing it with printed ephemeride lines in "Kosmos Himmelsjahr 2014"  
from Hans-Ulrich Keller,
pages 66 and 108 (look at attachments).
 
Ceres STELLARIUM position is about 5 days to the left side of dotted  line. 
The small circles with figures 2,3,4 mean 01.02.2014 / 01.03.2014 /  
01.04.2014 respectively , each at 00:00 UT / 01:00 MEZ.
Vesta / Pallas STELLARIUM positions are about 2 days to the left  of those 
dotted lines.
Pallas Stellarium orbit line moves a bit to the right of dotted line in the 
 picture, estimated half of a degree
(30 minutes). Vesta /Ceres orbit lines' position I did not check  until 
now...maybe they are wrong a bit too. 
 
I am living in Germany near Stuttgart, N 48.45  E 09.15  about.
 
Hope this helps?
 
Best regards,
 
Torsten
 
 
In a message dated 11.03.2014 20:35:32 Mitteleuropäische Zeit,  
<email address hidden> writes:

Is it a  clean installation of  Stellarium? Have you enable the
correction of  light speed? Which coordinates of minor planets you
checked? Which location  you has as your place?

-- 
You received this bug notification  because you are subscribed to the  bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291005

Title:
very wrong positions of minor planets

Status in Stellarium:
New

Bug description:
I tried to observe three of the minor  planets during last two weeks
(Pallas, Vesta, Ceres) and had  problems to find their positions at the
night sky using Stellarium  0.12.4 version. With Pallas and Vesta I
succeeded at last, but not  really satisfied when comparing real
constellation with  constellation shown in Stellarium. But with Ceres I
failed  completely last night. At the position where she should have to
be  seen very clearly  there was nothing than black space.  Comparing
your calculated ephemerides with an annual guide I am  using since a
couple of years with great success,  I realized  that Ceres was shown
at a position at least

5 DAYS TOO  LATE !

Similarly did that happen to Pallas and Vesta positions,  but they 
differred 'only' about two days in movement (too late also),  and
Pallas' orbit line is not really what you will observe in the  sky, it 
moves a bit more to the right (smaller values of rectascension I  estimate, 
maybe smaller values of declination too). 

Of course  this experience was some sort of frustrating for me as I trusted 
in calculated  positions of such well-known objects in the sky even if 
Stellarium is an  amateur developped program with no cost. Now I am irritated a 
bit whether  or
not there is to be trusted in the shown positions of other minor  objects.

Maybe there is an unsufficient input of data for  ephemerides of minor 
planets in summary (no disturbing calculation?
wrong equinox or without adjustment to nowadays?). I only can guess, but I  
dont know. It would be fine if you find
the reason for this problem  and it can be solved.

Thank you for listening to my  description!

Best regards,

Torsten  Merkel

To manage notifications about this bug go  to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/stellarium/+bug/1291005/+subscriptions