Option to set output quality to original quality

Bug #296017 reported by carlos
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
soundconverter (Ubuntu)

Bug Description

Binary package hint: soundconverter

It would be great if soundconverter could assign the output quality based on the original file's one. If you want to convert files with different original qualities, you have to, either downsample some of them (making the output quality equal to the lowest among your files), or make unnecessary big files (setting the output to match the highest of them).

Tags: whishlist
Revision history for this message
Stefan Friesel (stefan-friesel) wrote :

This is not a bug. Re-compressing a lossy file always results in generation loss, especially recompressing a low quality file with poor quality would result in horrible quality. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_loss#Techniques_that_cause_generation_loss_in_digital_systems

Revision history for this message
GautierPortet (kassoulet) wrote :

Stefan, I think Carlos want something like "80% of the quality of the original file", so you can assign a target bitrate for each file, based on the original one.
That's not so easy to do, it's not a feature I can manage to add at the moment (how do you handle lossless->lossy?, etc...).
But all patches and ideas are welcomed :)

Revision history for this message
Stefan Friesel (stefan-friesel) wrote :

It depends.
If you by quality mean the actual sound quality, then 80% pretty much means "low" quality (or some other constant setting) in the current interface.

But if you mean bitrate (as soundconverter currently does) I don't think this would be a useful setting for 3 reasons.

1) Let's say I want to convert a 192kb/s AAC and a 96kb/s vorbis to mp3. So I convert them to 154kb/s and 77kb/s respectively. The former still is probably quite close to CD quality while the second is by far less than "very low quality".

2) Generation loss highly depends on the techniques used in both the compression and the re-compression.

3) It would not be accessible to the user what 80% means in that context and especially the higher settings like "120% of original quality" would need a lot of explanation. So even if this is hypothetically useful to some, it would be confusing for most users to see that option.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.