Eu  concordo plenamente, porem é bom salientar que atualizações de segurança
o próprio nome já diz, agora informar que estão disponíveis atualizações de
segurança e instalar GAMES no lugar é um pouco destemperado em meu
churrasco, creio que o correto é informar o usuário que existem atualizações
disponíveis, porem na linguagem que consta no sistema do próprio.




2010/12/15 justindisgustin <email address hidden>

> I'm a relatively advanced user and there was no way for me to feel
> confident in choosing one of these options without doing research.  Not only
> is the wording ambiguous, but the options are too few.  For example, what if
> for some reason I wanted the security updates to be downloaded in the
> background?  Or what if I wanted all updates to be automatically installed?
> These seem like separate issues but they are part of why the ambiguous
> wording is problematic.  Why does one of these options pertain to security
> updates only, while the other two pertain to all updates?  This adds to the
> confusion.  I like the idea of a grid of radio buttons that was suggested,
> but if the text could be made more clear and possibly have the option to
> hover over or click on the text for more detailed information, it would help
> too.
> Something should be changed, anyway.  I think that this should actually be
> a  higher priority because even though it's an issue of wording, the wording
> is describing settings for a very important function.  I think to say that
> this is of low importance is like saying that documentation for a given
> software is trivial.  If everything works as intended by the developer but
> people don't know how the developer intended it to work, the potential for
> misuse is great.
>
> ** Description changed:
>
> - In Feisty the options for automatic updates in the Software Sources
> - window are unclear.
> + In Feisty, Intrepid, Jaunty, Karmic and Lucid the options for automatic
> + updates in the Software Sources window are unclear.
>
>  Currently they are:
>
>  -Install security updates without confirmation.
>  -Download all updates in the background
>  -Only Notify about updates
>
>  Which leads to the obvious, and I imagine wrong-headed, question - What
>  if I want to install security updates without confirmation and download
>  all updates in the background?
>
>  I can infer that the security policy goes from most automated to least,
>  and so that if I'm installing security updates I'm also downloading the
>  rest.  But why not spell it a little more clearly?  I remember the old
>  language seemed good but this is the best I can do, ordered from least
>  automated to most:
>
>  Notify about available updates and ask for permission to install.
> -  but don't install any.
> +  but don't install any.
>   Download all updates in the background and install security updates
> without confirmation.
>
>  If that is too long, I think this might be explicit enough, though still
>  potentially ambiguous.
>
>  Only notify about available updates.
>  Download all updates in the background.
>  Download all updates in the background and install security updates
> without confirmation.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> Software Properties.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96705
>
> Title:
>   Unclear language about Automatic Updates in Software Sources
>
> Status in The apt sources.list editor used in Ubuntu (and Kubuntu):
>  New
> Status in “synaptic” package in Ubuntu:
>  Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>   In Feisty, Intrepid, Jaunty, Karmic and Lucid the options for automatic
> updates in the Software Sources window are unclear.
>
> Currently they are:
>
> -Install security updates without confirmation.
> -Download all updates in the background
> -Only Notify about updates
>
> Which leads to the obvious, and I imagine wrong-headed, question - What if
> I want to install security updates without confirmation and download all
> updates in the background?
>
> I can infer that the security policy goes from most automated to least, and
> so that if I'm installing security updates I'm also downloading the rest.
>  But why not spell it a little more clearly?  I remember the old language
> seemed good but this is the best I can do, ordered from least automated to
> most:
>
> Notify about available updates and ask for permission to install.
>  but don't install any.
> Download all updates in the background and install security updates without
> confirmation.
>
> If that is too long, I think this might be explicit enough, though still
> potentially ambiguous.
>
> Only notify about available updates.
> Download all updates in the background.
> Download all updates in the background and install security updates without
> confirmation.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 









                     *VISITE MEU BLOG
http://jujubasblog-jubasblog.blogspot.com

http://twitter.com/jujubasblog/with_friends<link*>
JS