Comment 9 for bug 1470265
Revision history for this message
| Brandon Schaefer (brandontschaefer) wrote | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
The issue for the '_' was the assumed 3 word split on a '_' right? So then cant we just move to make it so a split on a binary would use split[0], split[1] + ... + split[n-1], split[n]? This way we still get the 3 strings needed, but we support a arbitrary number of split words produced by splitting on '_'?