using lxd provider on s390 fails
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Snapcraft |
Expired
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
When using the lxd provider to build on s390, it fails with the following message:
SNAPCRAFT_
The LXD provider is offered as a technology preview for early adopters.
The command line interface, container names or lifecycle handling may change in upcoming releases.
Launching a container.
An error occurred with the instance when trying to launch with 'LXD': Create instance: Requested architecture isn't supported by this host.
Ensure that 'LXD' is setup correctly and try again.
The snap / project I am trying to build is: https:/
I can successfully build using the host provider, remote-build option of snapcraft also fails, but with different messages.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 22:40:40 -0300, Wouter van Bommel wrote:
> Public bug reported: BUILD_ENVIRONME NT=lxd snapcraft
>
> When using the lxd provider to build on s390, it fails with the
> following message:
>
> SNAPCRAFT_
> The LXD provider is offered as a technology preview for early adopters.
> The command line interface, container names or lifecycle handling may change in upcoming releases.
> Launching a container.
> An error occurred with the instance when trying to launch with 'LXD': Create instance: Requested architecture isn't supported by this host.
> Ensure that 'LXD' is setup correctly and try again.
You need Snapcraft 4.0 to use --use-lxd on anything that is not x86_64,
you can find Snapcraft 4.0 on the candidate channel.
> /github. com/matrix-
> The snap / project I am trying to build is: https:/
> org/synapse, with some tweaks as I am attempting to debug an issue in
> the build.
>
> I can successfully build using the host provider, remote-build option of
> snapcraft also fails, but with different messages.
remote-build would indeed fail differently. If this turns out to not be
an issue with the code being built, then please log a different bug for this.
status incomplete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJSBAEBCgA8FiE EHG3MKdmE8/ EePzj+cTHJMgEuf SUFAl69LH0eHHNl cmdpby5z vbmljYWwuY29tAA oJEHExyTIBLn0lE CAP/0S2cBND+ TFproyL 30yO6KDlSCCz1lh 5Z0ygfnnIV/ p4/E26Kwy1rVMfM or/qQJBh LVyTBG4P06UAsKX U3YAFuldgLZbPqe M12pUGQFHiFeDdG ZgjL GKTPUaix0isz7lI cE2+6ygEOlUBeO6 ztG7axpNxRS3lJQ d003 rP6KoHwlEF0Upmp 515Bq5WrMeEBVrt MLcdN0AF5phsoLr bv82 WWyqi0cVCBGSOYY 065buCUy2S2BWkr SojxSmfUpFmhJIZ wvVB N2oH36r9uJks3g5 bKngtZ3CtlUdr00 WSQm2U8zX3ErVfT n3uf+Uej SBrl/MvLu5ohRPv bXSejIfGyMCfSoG 3WsAyGTXRWfn7Dp 1sZd wiYGquduqDHzSSa RvXB+SEEvk9MKd2 ns/z26hYXqMh6Fj aRqT 8uFkDAfz9vUuNM+ /JrALoVU+ 9hwB4KqQ+ 99+mCjaJ4raVIF2 Q mhnOaN9N3PZyWJu FggMQxDJU/ 9GFbY3hgAOnv8mf Zb/bFAuGHoSPR n/OisWEbbut1D
Y2h2ZXpvdkBjYW5
CVFig7dCQzrUq5Q
egONjM0hajbAr48
+edya8dmFgtFdJS
fY7J20XNZYa7Imq
k4YID6sf7QYFVQc
DUnRyz2wD7+
pAxxMkWWubsYukq
a8nhFBaeB4RHNMo
UYDAjh1sNKyiPWa
/0+ndtONap/
cXGax0pLefXxrKm
=FG61
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----