Activity log for bug #1655008

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2017-01-09 13:04:22 Dalton Durst bug added bug
2017-01-10 03:46:32 Leo Arias tags dirty
2017-01-10 03:53:08 Leo Arias snapcraft: status New Confirmed
2017-01-10 13:09:59 Dalton Durst description Currently, if I make a change to my kernel source (I'm using a source in '.' in my case) then commit it, Snapcraft simply ignores the changes since it has pulled the source previously, printing 'Skipping pull kernel (already ran)'. I have to run 'snapcraft clean' in order to get it to pull the (local) source again. Snapcraft then goes on and redownloads 'os.snap', a 60MB file. On a fast connection, this is no problem. I'm on a slightly slower connection that also has a data cap, so this is a waste of both time and bits. It seems like there are two ways to avoid this: Cache os.snap locally, or have Snapcraft run 'git pull' to grab source changes into its working directory. The second option seems better as it will behave similar to a non-anap build, wh3re editing the source code has an immediate change. Currently, if I make a change to my kernel source (I'm using a source in '.' in my case) then commit it, Snapcraft simply ignores the changes since it has pulled the source previously, printing 'Skipping pull kernel (already ran)'. I have to run 'snapcraft clean' in order to get it to pull the (local) source again. Snapcraft then goes on and redownloads 'os.snap', a 60MB file. On a fast connection, this is no problem. I'm on a slightly slower connection that also has a data cap, so this is a waste of both time and bits. It seems like there are two ways to avoid this: Cache os.snap locally, or have Snapcraft run 'git pull' to grab source changes into its working directory. The second option seems better as it will behave similar to a non-snap build, where editing the source code has an immediate change.
2017-01-17 20:39:57 Sergio Schvezov snapcraft: assignee Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens)