inconsistency between version_id and id in Silva xml

Bug #101236 reported by Martijn Faassen
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Silva
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

There is an inconsistency in the Silva XML now where content objects have an
'version_id' attribute, while workflow uses 'id' for the same information. We
might want to make this more consistent.

Tags: silva-future
Revision history for this message
Andy Altepeter (aaltepet) wrote :

This sounds like the old-style silva xml? I don't think Martijn is talking about the silva document (parsed) xml here...and I am also not familiar with "workflow"

Changed in silva:
assignee: nobody → kitblake
Revision history for this message
Kit Blake (kitblake) wrote :

Marking as incomplete because we don't want to forget this, but aren't going to work on it either as we'd prefer to get worklfow management happening.

Changed in silva:
assignee: kitblake → nobody
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Sylvain Viollon (thefunny) wrote :

This is easy to modify.

Changed in silva:
milestone: none → 3.1.0
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.