inconsistency between version_id and id in Silva xml

Bug #101236 reported by Martijn Faassen on 2004-09-30
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone

Bug Description

There is an inconsistency in the Silva XML now where content objects have an
'version_id' attribute, while workflow uses 'id' for the same information. We
might want to make this more consistent.

Andy Altepeter (aaltepet) wrote :

This sounds like the old-style silva xml? I don't think Martijn is talking about the silva document (parsed) xml here...and I am also not familiar with "workflow"

Changed in silva:
assignee: nobody → kitblake
Kit Blake (kitblake) wrote :

Marking as incomplete because we don't want to forget this, but aren't going to work on it either as we'd prefer to get worklfow management happening.

Changed in silva:
assignee: kitblake → nobody
status: New → Incomplete
Sylvain Viollon (thefunny) wrote :

This is easy to modify.

Changed in silva:
milestone: none → 3.1.0
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers