[1.0 tempFix] Linux/Unix: libVisionProxy.so does not work --- library load errors --- partly fixed in 1.1.0

[RaiMan]

************** fixed in 1.1.0

setup now contains a feature to build correct libs on the fly, if the prereqs are fulfilled

------------------------------------------------------

*** a possible solution: try to build it yourself
download the helper package here:
https://launchpad.net/sikuli/sikuli-api/1.0.0/+download/Sikuli-1.0.0-Supplemental-LinuxVisionProxy.zip

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sikuli-1.0.0-Supplemental-LinuxVisionProxy
==========================================

If you encounter any problems with the bundled libVisionProxy.so, then you might try to build it on your Linux/Unix system using this package.

1. put the unzipped stuff in any folder
2. in terminal session cd into that folder

3. run ./makeVisionProxy <your Java JDK>
where <your Java JDK> has to be the path to your default Java JDK
… the one that containes the folder include/
(e.g. on Ubuntu 12.10+ 64-Bit: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64 )

4. hopefully you see some compile messages and one link message without any additional error messages
5. if no errors: replace the libVisionProxy.so in your Sikuli installation with the new one from folder dist
6. if there are any error messages: ok, you have to solve them ;-) and start again at step 3

--- the prerequisites
- you need a valid g++ installation
- you need a valid Java JDK installation
- OpenCV must be installed (preferably version 2.4 with png and jpeg support, but at least 2.2)
- Tesseract must be installed (must be version 3.0+ incl. Leptonica)
- on some Linux installations additional dev packages might be needed to satisfy the includes during compile
- if you get any include problems in compile steps, you might have to add/modify -I.... entries on the includeFolder= line
- the command script expects the libraries in /usr/lib (change the variable libFolderO/libFolderT accordingly if you have other situation)

good luck ;-)

[Zed (zh2eou)]

Still having issue with this with 1.0.1 (see attachment). Has the tempfix been removed? Was going to poke into that more.

[RaiMan (raimund-hocke)]

Sorry, the packages are back now. (Take care, the source changed from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 because of internal structural changes)