It should be more clear that Shotwell maintains its own Trash
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
One Hundred Papercuts |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Shotwell |
New
|
Unknown
|
|||
shotwell (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: shotwell
One would expect that "Move to Trash" would move a file to Gnome's Trash. However, this is not the case. It's not obvious that it's moved to Trash within Shotwell, especially when a lot of tags are present and the Trash section is all the way at the bottom of the list.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: shotwell 0.7.2-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelMo
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 5 12:43:24 2010
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: shotwell
Changed in shotwell (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in shotwell: | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
milestone: | none → precise-6-photos |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
no longer affects: | hundredpapercuts |
Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
milestone: | none → papercuts-s-shotwell |
Yes, this is potentially confusing.
One possible solution would be to unify the Shotwell and GNOME trashes; see http:// trac.yorba. org/ticket/ 2645 .