Labels in read-only infobar are confusing
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scratch |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Mario Guerriero |
Bug Description
Right now the button labels in read-only file infobar are confusing. "Save as New file" should be something like "Save changes elsewhere". This is made worse by translations - translators often interpret the current variant as "save under a new name" or the like.
"Dismiss" doesn't make it obvious that the changes to this file won't be saved - if you e.g. switch to some other app and then return to edit the file, the changes will be lost but you may not remember that by that time. So we'll have to:
* either keep a notice about the fact that that the file won't be saved (bad idea because that doesn't get you rid of the infobar, and doesn't let you rever the decision either)
* or remove the "dismiss" button at all and just keep the original infobar there
* or replace the "dismiss" button with a button that makes the file read-only, but this has a potential problem with forgetting why the file is not editable and considering that a bug, so this solution probably requires nasty additional infobars...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: scratch 1.1-0~r761+
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: scratch
Date: Sun Jun 24 16:26:02 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120303)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
SHELL=
SourcePackage: scratch
SuspiciousXErrors:
ThirdParty: True
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
tags: | added: readonly-handling |
Changed in scratch: | |
milestone: | none → luna-beta1 |
Changed in scratch: | |
assignee: | nobody → elementary UX Team (elementary-design) |
Changed in scratch: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in scratch: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
What do you think about using "Ignore" instead of "Dismiss"? It is more obvious, as "Save changes elsewhere"