Comment 3 for bug 297307

On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 09:38 +0000, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> Why was this marked Incomplete?

Because it wasn't really "In Progress" and I'm not sure what to do about
it because our understanding of how to package and auto-install R6RS
libraries for multiple implementations seems to be incomplete. Making a
tarball is easy, but I don't know where to host it "for release". I'll
see if L.P. let's me host a tarball (know anything about this?). I
agree it would be good if the libraries could be installed using Make
(or any other installer), so "Confirmed" is probably more appropriate.

If/when my Library Files SRFI gets finalized, it will offer a standard
for file naming and finding and a single environment variable for
configuring search paths, which I hope will help solve the
packaging/installing problem. I submitted it over a month ago, and
yesterday I submitted some updates to it, and I'm just waiting for them
to stick it on the website as a draft. I don't know what the
delay/problem is. Four days ago, I asked what the status is, and I'm
waiting for a response. If you want to look at it, it's here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~derick-eddington/+junk/library-files