source form recorded for definitions at REPL is extremely verbose
This is SBCL 220.127.116.11, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (defun foo (bar) (+ bar 2))
* (describe 'foo)
FOO names a compiled function:
Derived type: (FUNCTION (T) (VALUES NUMBER &OPTIONAL))
(DECLARE (MUFFLE-CONDITIONS COMPILER-NOTE))
(BLOCK FOO (+ BAR 2)))))
Needless to say, the source form printed by DESCRIBE bears little resemblance to the original definition, and this gets worse when macros are involved. Surely the source form should be recorded pre-macroexpansion?