wanted: more specific derived types for known/standardized generic functions
Bug #677778 reported by
Tobias C. Rittweiler
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCL |
Triaged
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
I recently wanted to know whether CLASS-NAME returns a string or a symbol,
but C-c C-d d (output of DESCRIBE) didn't tell me.
Revision history for this message
| Nikodemus Siivola (nikodemus) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in sbcl: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| status: | New → Triaged |
To post a comment you must log in.
This is quite irritating, I agree. It would be also nice if users were able to PROCLAIM gf types without them being stomped on by PCL.