Comment 8 for bug 573747

Revision history for this message
Nikodemus Siivola (nikodemus) wrote :

Sorry about the following fussiness -- but when this is fixed, I think it's better to fix it properly:

* The error should be a PROGRAM-ERROR, and preferably a REFERENCE-CONDITION.

* Need to make the compiler behave equivalently: the current WARNING for a misplaced DECLARE should probably be changed into a a COMPILER-ERROR -> PROGRAM-ERROR, and the expressions nested inside the DECLARE should not be compiled.

* Test-cases.