--save-runtime-options does not save all runtime options

Bug #450280 reported by Attila Lendvai on 2009-10-13
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
SBCL
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

namely:
 --lose-on-corruption
 --disable-ldb
 more?

tried to come up with a patch, but lost nerves in C territory and stopped guessing about maintainer coding standards, too... why is there a struct runtime_options instead of simply using the serialized form for storing the runtime options in the runtime_options global?

Changed in sbcl:
status: New → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: added: runtime
Attila Lendvai (attila-lendvai) wrote :

this could be superseded by https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/586434 , although storing the invocation values of those runtime options as defaults for the produced executable may be useful.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers