SBCL

--save-runtime-options does not save all runtime options

Bug #450280 reported by Attila Lendvai
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
SBCL
Confirmed
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

namely:
 --lose-on-corruption
 --disable-ldb
 more?

tried to come up with a patch, but lost nerves in C territory and stopped guessing about maintainer coding standards, too... why is there a struct runtime_options instead of simply using the serialized form for storing the runtime options in the runtime_options global?

Tags: runtime
Nikodemus Siivola (nikodemus)
Changed in sbcl:
status: New → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → Medium
Attila Lendvai (attila-lendvai)
tags: added: runtime
Revision history for this message
Attila Lendvai (attila-lendvai) wrote :

this could be superseded by https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/586434 , although storing the invocation values of those runtime options as defaults for the produced executable may be useful.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.