I forgot to mention that my modern version has always contained 148 "RS" links to easily get to the corresponding section in Robert Strandh's more barren version.
I think this should be enough to satisfy the three people would would prefer the old barren version over my modern version.
I think it would be entirely appropriate to fix this link.
(And that it would be user-hostile malpractice not to do so.)
(My native "barren" feature is still planned but its development has unfortunately bogged down for the time being.)
I forgot to mention that my modern version has always contained 148 "RS" links to easily get to the corresponding section in Robert Strandh's more barren version.
I think this should be enough to satisfy the three people would would prefer the old barren version over my modern version.
I think it would be entirely appropriate to fix this link.
(And that it would be user-hostile malpractice not to do so.)
(My native "barren" feature is still planned but its development has unfortunately bogged down for the time being.)
PS: My related specbot PR still hasn't had a response after 9 months, which is expected but still infuriating and unconscionable. https:/ /github. com/stassats/ lisp-bots/ pull/6
PPS: I'll spare you a deeply contextually relevant link into a recent thread on my twitter.