Uncaught compiler errors for INLINE, NOTINLINE on invalid function names

Bug #1740782 reported by Paul F. Dietz on 2018-01-01
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
SBCL
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

(lambda () (declare (inline 0)))
(lambda () (declare (notinline 0)))

both cause

Invalid function name: 0
   [Condition of type SIMPLE-TYPE-ERROR]
[...]
Backtrace:
  0: (FBOUNDP 0)
  1: ((LAMBDA (SB-IMPL::NAME) :IN "SYS:SRC;COMPILER;GLOBALDB.LISP") 0)
  2: (SB-IMPL::GET-INFO-VALUE 0 1)
  3: (SB-C::FIND-FREE-FUN 0 "in an inline or notinline declaration")
[...]

Stas Boukarev (stassats) on 2018-01-01
Changed in sbcl:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Low
tags: added: malformed-source
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers