Documentation for SBCL's support (or lack thereof) for position independent code and executables
Bug #1719243 reported by
reddaly
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCL |
Incomplete
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Does SBCL support position independent code?
I don't actually understand the point of PIC, but apparently it is becoming the default or even required on some OSes. As I understand it, SBCL doesn't support PIC. What would it take?
Revision history for this message
| Jan Moringen (scymtym) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in sbcl: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in sbcl: | |
| status: | Triaged → Incomplete |
To post a comment you must log in.
Can you elaborate? Are you asking about building SBCL's runtime with PIC-related C-compiler options or is the question about code emitted by SBCL's compiler, or the fasl format?
If possible, please give a concrete, reproducible example of something that doesn't work as expected.