Activity log for bug #1439504

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2015-04-02 05:09:21 James Kalenius bug added bug
2015-04-02 05:09:21 James Kalenius attachment added sbcl-format.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439504/+attachment/4363829/+files/sbcl-format.diff
2015-04-02 05:09:54 James Kalenius description (format "~vd" -100 -100) signals an error. This is not the case on other implementations and isn't really supported by the standard, which just says that at least that many columns are printed. In ansi-cl-tests not signalling an error is part of test format.d.29. The rest of the code as written works fine with negative numbers, so the error call (in format-write-field) just has to be deleted. Exists in my version and in github master. (format "~vd" -100 -100) signals an error. This is not the case on other implementations and isn't really supported by the standard, which just says that at least that many columns are printed. In ansi-cl-tests not signalling an error is part of test format.d.29. The rest of the code as written works fine with negative numbers, so the error call (in format-write-field) just has to be deleted. Exists in my distro's version (1.2.8) and in github master.
2015-09-05 11:47:46 Stas Boukarev sbcl: status New Won't Fix
2015-09-05 11:49:23 Stas Boukarev description (format "~vd" -100 -100) signals an error. This is not the case on other implementations and isn't really supported by the standard, which just says that at least that many columns are printed. In ansi-cl-tests not signalling an error is part of test format.d.29. The rest of the code as written works fine with negative numbers, so the error call (in format-write-field) just has to be deleted. Exists in my distro's version (1.2.8) and in github master. (format t "~vd" -100 -100) signals an error. This is not the case on other implementations and isn't really supported by the standard, which just says that at least that many columns are printed. In ansi-cl-tests not signalling an error is part of test format.d.29. The rest of the code as written works fine with negative numbers, so the error call (in format-write-field) just has to be deleted. Exists in my distro's version (1.2.8) and in github master.