sb-sprof: interrupt already pending on darwin 10.8.0

Bug #1102014 reported by Nikodemus Siivola
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
SBCL
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

On current master (3eed77547e03a57c9be57db74081ee0f39ed0fa6), sb-sprof test run fails for during the second test run.

> uname -a
Darwin delirium-3.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

Built using sh make.sh --fancy.

From the build log:

           Self Total Cumul
  Nr Count % Count % Count % Calls Function
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1 720 72.0 1000 100.0 720 72.0 - SB-SPROF::TEST-0
   2 280 28.0 280 28.0 1000 100.0 - SB-VM::GENERIC-+
   3 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-SPROF::TEST
   4 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV
   5 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - EVAL-TLF
   6 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET SB-FASL::EVAL-FORM :IN SB-INT:LOAD-AS-SOURCE)
   7 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-INT:LOAD-AS-SOURCE
   8 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET SB-FASL::LOAD-STREAM :IN LOAD)
   9 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - LOAD
  10 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - EVAL
  11 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-IMPL::PROCESS-EVAL/LOAD-OPTIONS
  12 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-INIT
  13 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-54 :IN SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE)
  14 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP :IN SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          0 0.0 elsewhere
.Profiler sample vector full (26317 traces / 500000 samples), doubling the size
fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 50684(tid 140735082593472):
interrupt already pending

make: *** [test] Error 1

WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass
their self-tests. Failed contribs:"
  sb-sprof

Tags: sb-sprof
Revision history for this message
Nikodemus Siivola (nikodemus) wrote :

I should note that this at the moment at least seems perfectly reproducible for me.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Uber (djuber) wrote :

I have had the same build experience on Darwin (sb-sprof test fails). Enabling --with-sb-threads resolved this issue for me.

Stas Boukarev (stassats)
tags: added: sb-sprof
Revision history for this message
Douglas Katzman (dougk) wrote :

obsolete most likely, can't repro it now.

Changed in sbcl:
status: New → Incomplete
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.