sb-sprof: interrupt already pending on darwin 10.8.0

Bug #1102014 reported by Nikodemus Siivola on 2013-01-20
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
SBCL
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

On current master (3eed77547e03a57c9be57db74081ee0f39ed0fa6), sb-sprof test run fails for during the second test run.

> uname -a
Darwin delirium-3.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

Built using sh make.sh --fancy.

From the build log:

           Self Total Cumul
  Nr Count % Count % Count % Calls Function
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1 720 72.0 1000 100.0 720 72.0 - SB-SPROF::TEST-0
   2 280 28.0 280 28.0 1000 100.0 - SB-VM::GENERIC-+
   3 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-SPROF::TEST
   4 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV
   5 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - EVAL-TLF
   6 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET SB-FASL::EVAL-FORM :IN SB-INT:LOAD-AS-SOURCE)
   7 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-INT:LOAD-AS-SOURCE
   8 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET SB-FASL::LOAD-STREAM :IN LOAD)
   9 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - LOAD
  10 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - EVAL
  11 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-IMPL::PROCESS-EVAL/LOAD-OPTIONS
  12 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-INIT
  13 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-54 :IN SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE)
  14 0 0.0 1000 100.0 1000 100.0 - (LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP :IN SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          0 0.0 elsewhere
.Profiler sample vector full (26317 traces / 500000 samples), doubling the size
fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 50684(tid 140735082593472):
interrupt already pending

make: *** [test] Error 1

WARNING! Some of the contrib modules did not build successfully or pass
their self-tests. Failed contribs:"
  sb-sprof

Nikodemus Siivola (nikodemus) wrote :

I should note that this at the moment at least seems perfectly reproducible for me.

Daniel Uber (djuber) wrote :

I have had the same build experience on Darwin (sb-sprof test fails). Enabling --with-sb-threads resolved this issue for me.

Stas Boukarev (stassats) on 2014-01-31
tags: added: sb-sprof
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers