Need review / changed numbers wrong

Bug #143964 reported by Timo Jyrinki
40
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

For example, on https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+lang/fi, a simple package like ksmserver says 2 needing review and 2 changed. However, no strings are in a needs review state, and previously changed strings have been changed back to "Packaged" nowadays.

The needs review stuff is the (really) new problem. Now that the numbers for changed are shown, it's probably the same thing why the graphs stay wrong even after setting strings back to "Packaged", see bug 126963.

Revision history for this message
Julian Alarcon (julian-alarcon) wrote :

Please!!!!.. Fix this error... Is damned annoying!!!...
This error is new and don't help us to make a precise translations.... Some packages are without translations but the first page show them without pending translations... like here..https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+lang/es/+index?start=995&batch=50, he package tracker is completely translated.. If you check this page, https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/tracker/+pots/tracker/es/+translate, to the left there is no any pending translation, but if you filter by "Need review", https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/tracker/+pots/tracker/es/+translate?batch=10&show=need_review, you have 13 results!!!.. Please, fix them!!

Revision history for this message
Julian Alarcon (julian-alarcon) wrote :

Sorry if I talk aggressively, sorry guys... But, This bug is so frustrating... Thanks folks!!! Bye..

Revision history for this message
Adi Roiban (adiroiban) wrote :

Hi,
I can confirm this bug in translations.edge.launchpad.net

At this page
https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+lang/ro/+index?start=0&batch=50

gnome-menus need 30 reviews

But here no reviews are required
https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/gnome-menus/+pots/gnome-menus/ro/+translate?batch=10&show=need_review

good luck

Revision history for this message
David Planella (dpm) wrote :

I can confirm this behaviour as well. The "Need review" and "Changed" stats do not reflect the real "Need review" and "Changed" strings.

I firstly observed it on the Catalan translation of Evolution at https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/evolution/+translate, but it seems to happen to other packages as well.

Changed in rosetta:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Данило Шеган (danilo) wrote :

There's some confusion here.
  - Number of 'Need review' strings on the overview page is the number of messages which have new, unreviewed suggestions, so the proper filter to use is 'with new suggestions', and not 'needs review': for examples given above which I checked, this seems to work correctly; we should not have used the same title here, so this is our fault.
  - 'needs review' filter is total borkage, and needs to be either renamed to 'fuzzy' (to match gettext terminology), or completely removed; I'd go for completely removing it, but we'd need to replace it with a different 'similarity matching' to help with translations instead
  - Those numbers on the overview pages should link directly to filtered pages: I have a branch ready, and that will be available in 1.1.12 (December release)
  - po file stats will be correctly updated after 1.1.11 release, but we still need to fix a lot of old data; that is mostly ready (we have a script which does that), but there were some minor issues with it, and we didn't have time to look into them for 1.1.11.

Revision history for this message
Julian Alarcon (julian-alarcon) wrote :

I really think hat need review is an important tool....

Or maybe, we must to change something. Official translators, like me, don't have the chance to make JUST a suggestion, so, in this way, the "need review" allow us to make this kind of things. We aren't super translators, we make mistakes and we are not sure of everything.. so, if we can make just a suggestion.. all is done...

Revision history for this message
Данило Шеган (danilo) wrote :
Changed in rosetta:
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Tom (tom6) wrote :

Oh, i assumed that 'Needs Review' was a valid tool doing just what it says on the tin. Perhaps using a voting system to see which translation meets with the greatest approval. Is this not the case?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.