fpu/softfloat.c: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression

Bug #1881004 reported by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
QEMU
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Last time I built QEMU was on commit d5c75ec500d96f1d93447f990cd5a4ef5ba27fae,
I just pulled to fea8f3ed739536fca027cf56af7f5576f37ef9cd and now get:

  CC lm32-softmmu/fpu/softfloat.o
fpu/softfloat.c:3365:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
    absZ &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            !
fpu/softfloat.c:3423:18: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
        absZ0 &= ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( absZ1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                 !
fpu/softfloat.c:3483:18: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
        absZ0 &= ~(((uint64_t)(absZ1<<1) == 0) & roundNearestEven);
                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                 !
fpu/softfloat.c:3606:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
    zSig &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            !
fpu/softfloat.c:3760:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
    zSig &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x200 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            !
fpu/softfloat.c:3987:21: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
                    ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( zSig1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    !
fpu/softfloat.c:4003:22: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
            zSig0 &= ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( zSig1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                     !
fpu/softfloat.c:4273:18: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
        zSig1 &= ~ ( ( zSig2 + zSig2 == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                 !
8 errors generated.

$ clang -v
clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1
Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal

Revision history for this message
Peter Maydell (pmaydell) wrote : Re: [Bug 1881004] [NEW] fpu/softfloat.c: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 20:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Public bug reported:
>
> Last time I built QEMU was on commit d5c75ec500d96f1d93447f990cd5a4ef5ba27fae,
> I just pulled to fea8f3ed739536fca027cf56af7f5576f37ef9cd and now get:
>
> CC lm32-softmmu/fpu/softfloat.o
> fpu/softfloat.c:3365:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
> absZ &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> !

"(x & y)" is not a boolean expression, so we should report this to clang
as a bug (I assume what they actually are trying to complain about is
bitwise AND with a boolean expression).

thanks
-- PMM

Revision history for this message
Eric Blake (eblake) wrote :

On 5/27/20 4:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 20:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Public bug reported:
>>
>> Last time I built QEMU was on commit d5c75ec500d96f1d93447f990cd5a4ef5ba27fae,
>> I just pulled to fea8f3ed739536fca027cf56af7f5576f37ef9cd and now get:
>>
>> CC lm32-softmmu/fpu/softfloat.o
>> fpu/softfloat.c:3365:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation]
>> absZ &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven );
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> !
>
>
> "(x & y)" is not a boolean expression, so we should report this to clang
> as a bug (I assume what they actually are trying to complain about is
> bitwise AND with a boolean expression).

We have:

uint64_t &= ~ ( ( ( int8_t ^ int ) == int ) & bool )

which is

uint64_t &= ~ ( bool & bool )

which is then

uint64_t &= ~ ( int )

resulting in one of:

uint64_t &= 0xffffffffffffffff
uint64_t &= 0xfffffffffffffffe

It is a very odd way of stating that 'if this condition is true, mask
out the least-significant-bit'. In general, 'bool & bool' is used where
the side-effect-skipping 'bool && bool' is inappropriate; I'm a bit
surprised that clang is not questioning whether we meant '&&' instead of
'&' (the two operators give the same effect in this case).

You are right that clang is fishy for calling it logical negation of a
bool, when it is really logical negation of an int, but we are also
fishy in that we are using bitwise AND of two bools as an int in the
first place.

Regardless of whether clang changes, would it be better to write the
code as:

if (((roundBits ^ 0x40) == 0) && roundNearestEven) {
     absZ &= ~1;
}

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org

Revision history for this message
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (philmd) wrote :
Changed in qemu:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Peter Maydell (pmaydell) wrote :

Fixed in commit 4066288694c3bdd175df8, which will be in 5.1.

Changed in qemu:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Thomas Huth (th-huth)
Changed in qemu:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.