> On Oct 04, 2016, at 05:36, Daniel P. Berrange <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>> Yes, definitely. Check this:
>
> [snip]
>
> So in that case, I think we must add ability to specify an explicit path
> that apps can use *regardles* of whether memfd support exists or not.
>
>>> On Oct 03, 2016, at 15:46, Rafael David Tinoco <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you're saying that the file descriptor here is actually getting
>>>> passed to a different process for it to use ?
Let me work on it. I'll get back soon.
Tks Daniel.
> On Oct 04, 2016, at 05:36, Daniel P. Berrange <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>> Yes, definitely. Check this:
>
> [snip]
>
> So in that case, I think we must add ability to specify an explicit path
> that apps can use *regardles* of whether memfd support exists or not.
>
>>> On Oct 03, 2016, at 15:46, Rafael David Tinoco <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you're saying that the file descriptor here is actually getting
>>>> passed to a different process for it to use ?