IPV6 tracker connection needs improvement

[funicorn]

I know there are differences on the IPV6 tracker exploring for different BT clients. As far as I know utorrent is the most excellent one among all these clients including qbittorrent, transmission, deluge, etc.

I'm not an expert so I don't know what details make one better than the others, whereas the fact is some clients, qbittorrent for example, got no torrent connection speed while utorrent works just fine under the same situation. This happens even when a "wined" utorrent is used on linux.

 I'd like to provide one sample torrent file, which is announced by this IPV6 BT website: bt.neu6.edu.cn. qtorrent works fine on most of torrents, and fails on a few of them. But utorrent could download the file without problem.

Lastly I want to add qbittorrent is far better than the widley used bt client transmission on linux platform.

[Christophe Dumez (hydr0g3n)]

qBittorrent is a GUI, it does not actually handle Bittorrent protocol. qBittorrent, as Deluge, is based on libtorrent-rasterbar.

Therefore, your issue would be better handled on libtorrent-rasterbar bug tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/libtorrent/issues/entry