| 2011-07-04 16:54:36 |
Ahmed Kamal |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2011-11-16 23:31:03 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2011-11-16 23:31:07 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2011-11-16 23:31:16 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: assignee |
|
Benjamin Saller (bcsaller) |
|
| 2011-11-16 23:33:20 |
Clint Byrum |
description |
Multiple formulas should be allowed to co-exist on a single instance. Useful use cases for that would be running machine policy formulas, or running multiple independant services on one instance lowering operational running cost |
Multiple charms should be allowed to co-exist on a single instance. The use case for that would be running machine policy charms. |
|
| 2011-11-16 23:34:15 |
Clint Byrum |
summary |
Break the one service-unit per instance assumption |
Policy charms should be able to be deployed along side other charms inside the same machine/container. |
|
| 2011-11-16 23:34:19 |
Clint Byrum |
juju: milestone |
|
florence |
|
| 2012-03-16 23:32:42 |
Kapil Thangavelu |
branch linked |
|
lp:~bcsaller/juju/subordinate-unit-agent-deploy |
|
| 2012-03-21 16:28:10 |
Mark Russell |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mark Russell |
| 2012-04-12 09:46:10 |
Benjamin Saller |
juju: status |
In Progress |
Fix Released |
|
