procenv

  1. Bug #1333194
  2. Comment #8

Comment 8 for bug 1333194

Revision history for this message
Dave Love (fx-gnu) wrote :

James Hunt <email address hidden> writes:

> Hi Dave - thanks for your patience. I believe I've now resolved the
> build issue if you could try lp:procenv again.

It builds OK now, thanks.

> Could you provide any more details on the NUMA issue? procenv now uses
> the old numa 0.9.8 API for Centos 5 but I may be misusing that API. It
> would be great if libnuma actually had a little more documentation :-)

It looks as if it's just a result of ! HAVE_SCHED_GETCPU and
LIBNUMA_API_VERSION. I should have looked before.