Improve lid tests

[Jerry Kao]

LP:868678 lid_open and lid_close tests need to be re-written
​LP:1103925 lid_open test does not make sense
LP:1832683 Test case lid_open was done immediately
LP:1832678 Automated power-management/lid test

Following the idea to automated power-management/lid test (suspend), I am thinking we could merge lid(suspend), lid_close and lid_open into one or improve the tests.

The idea is tester doing the lid close/open one time, then checkbox can verify the status of suspend/resume, lid_close/open from dmesg/kernel log and /proc/acpi/button/lid/*/state automatically

[Jerry Kao (jerry.kao)]

<spineau> JerryKao: this job verification could be automated I agree
<spineau> JerryKao: with a job plugin update: user-interact-verify -> user-interact

<spineau> JerryKao: I'm looking (again) at 'fwts lid' test
<spineau> JerryKao: it's an old test and it does not seem to check that it triggers a S3 cycle (that may have been disabled for this event)
<spineau> JerryKao: but it could be a good replacement for the lid/close/open tests

[Maksim Beliaev (beliaev-maksim)]

Bug was migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/canonical/checkbox/issues/65.
Bug is no more monitored here.