Comment 6 for bug 386741

Hi Juho,

Please remove the _set_photo_date method() it seems irrelevant. It makes indeed little sense to modify filetime. I remember an user asking for it as he liked to have the exif and file times synchronized. If we want to implement it, we would need to add two extra fields:
- ChoiceField Source: Exif or File
- ChoiceField Target: Both, Exif or File

Moreover we would need to store the datetime in the photo object and modify photo.save it uses it. Maybe this is too much work and we could extend it, when there is a demand for it. So leave it for now, we have more important things to do.

You should have mentioned that you wanted to include a module and put the right copyright information in phatch/copyright:
$ bzr diff copyright
=== modified file 'copyright'
--- copyright 2009-06-11 16:44:23 +0000
+++ copyright 2009-06-15 05:34:58 +0000
@@ -156,6 +156,16 @@
    http://www.python.org/ftp/python/contrib-09-Dec-1999/DataStructures/

+The file phatch/other/relativedelta.py is a source file of dateutil and is
+licensed under its license:
+
+ Copyright (c) 2003-2007 Gustavo Niemeyer <email address hidden>
+
+ This module offers extensions to the standard python 2.3+
+ datetime module.
+
+ PSF License
+
 The file phatch/other/findsystem.py is a source file of TTFQuery-1.0.1 and is
 licensed under its license:

In this case there is no problem as it is compatible with the GPL. It is now added to phatch/other so you can import it with
>>> from relativedelta import relativedelta

Can you please attach an updated fix?