[Percona XtraDB Cluster threading model - parenthesis mixup]
Bug #1625972 reported by
Daniel Brahneborg
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percona XtraDB Cluster moved to https://jira.percona.com/projects/PXC | Status tracked in 5.6 | |||||
| 5.6 |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Hrvoje Matijakovic | |||
Bug Description
[In:/doc/
The section about the Rollback thread looks like this:
Why do we need a rollback thread (there is only one rollback thread)?
* Transactions executed in parallel can conflict and may need to rollback. A rollback thread helps achieve this. Applier transactions always take priority over local transactions. (This is natural, as applier transactions have been accepted by the cluster, and some of the nodes may have already applied them.
* Local conflicting transactions still has a window to rollback.)
The parenthesis that starts with "This is natural" should probably be closed before the next bullet?
Revision history for this message
| Krunal Bauskar (krunal-bauskar) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | New → Invalid |
Revision history for this message
| Krunal Bauskar (krunal-bauskar) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | Invalid → Confirmed |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Alexey Zhebel (alexey-zhebel) |
Revision history for this message
| Hrvoje Matijakovic (hrvojem) wrote | #3 |
Revision history for this message
| Shahriyar Rzayev (rzayev-sehriyar) wrote | #4 |
To post a comment you must log in.
On Blog front it looks sane
<directly from blog>
"Applier transactions always take priority over local transactions. (This is natural, as applier transactions have been accepted by the cluster, and some of the nodes may have already applied them. Local conflicting transactions still has a window to rollback.)
"
<directly from blog>
Not sure how do you got the extra bullet before Local.