When backup locks are used, xtrabackup_slave_info should be written under BINLOG lock

Bug #1328532 reported by Alexey Kopytov on 2014-06-10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Percona XtraBackup
Alexey Kopytov
Alexey Kopytov

Bug Description

Currently when backup locks are used in 2.2, the xtrabackup_slave_info file is written under the TABLES lock. Which is wrong, it should be written under the BINLOG one.

Related branches

description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers