Comment 1 for bug 996069
Revision history for this message
| Baron Schwartz (baron-xaprb) wrote Re: [Bug 996069] [NEW] Incorrect RES.001 | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Actually that test case shows a different thing we ought to be catching: if you GROUP BY something that's constrained to be a constant, you should really not GROUP BY it. We might want to create a new rule for that.