description is misleading

Bug #851979 reported by Sheeri K. Cabral
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Percona Toolkit moved to https://jira.percona.com/projects/PT
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

The project homepage says "This project and the majority of its code was forked from Maatkit (http://www.maatkit.org) in June 2011."

There are 2 things wrong here - first, it says it was forked, and 2nd, the date says June 2011.

According to:
http://groups.google.com/group/maatkit-discuss/browse_thread/thread/2565ba4046c3a23f/0e8c9ac795b029d6?lnk=gst&q=percona+commercial#0e8c9ac795b029d6

Baron himself says on July 6th that it's a "plan".... "We plan to create a Percona Toolkit". The launchpad page for the Percona Toolkit was registered June 4th, which is planning ahead.

Hrm....https://launchpad.net/percona-toolkit/+series shows that the first fork of maatkit was July 1st, 2011. Which is sadly before Baron's mailing list post, which means that was misleading to begin with. I would hope for more integrity than that. Regardless, July 1st is NOT June. I cannot find a source that verifies the code was forked in June 2011, and many that state or suggest July 2011.

Back to the first issue, and this is a bigger issue, but also deals with integrity. Saying "it's forked" is misleading, because Baron and Daniel are abandoning maatkit and aspersa in favor of Percona Toolkit as per:
- http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/09/01/want-to-hack-maatkit-and-aspersa-were-hiring/
- the banner at http://www.maatkit.org/, which clearly states "Maatkit has become part of Percona Toolkit, and there will be no further development or releases of Maatkit separately from Percona Toolkit."
- a similar banner at http://code.google.com/p/aspersa/

Please stop the misleading propaganda and lies. Aspersa and Maatkit are abandoned, taken over by the Percona Toolkit.

Tags: lies percona
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Baron Schwartz (baron-xaprb) wrote :

Thanks for the feedback, but this is not a bug.

Changed in percona-toolkit:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Sheeri K. Cabral (awfief) wrote :

I agree, but there wasn't a way to add a "documentation request".

Whatever the 'category' should be (bug, documentation request, whatever), I see that the description is changed to not be misleading, so thank you!

Revision history for this message
Shahriyar Rzayev (rzayev-sehriyar) wrote :

Percona now uses JIRA for bug reports so this bug report is migrated to: https://jira.percona.com/browse/PT-874

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.