pt-stalk --sleep should never be less than --run-time.

Reported by Jay Janssen on 2013-07-18
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Percona Toolkit
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

pt-stalk 2.2.3

Ran:
pt-stalk --no-stalk --run-time=600

While it ran, pt-stalk triggered another collection every 300 seconds (AFAICT).

- pt-stalk should never be capable of collecting twice at once
- --sleep should never be allowed to be lower than --run-time
- didn't --sleep used to kick in AFTER the collection was done?

tags: added: pt-stalk
Changed in percona-toolkit:
status: New → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers