Percona Server with XtraDB

[DOC] Misleading title for write-intensive optimizations page in the manual

Reported by Alexey Kopytov on 2013-10-22
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Percona Server
Status tracked in 5.6
5.6
Medium
Hrvoje Matijakovic

Bug Description

http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/5.6/performance/xtradb_performance_improvements.html (both URL and title) makes the impression that optimizations listed on that page are the only performance improvements in XtraDB. Which is obviously false.

Either fix the URL and the title to something like "write_intensive_workloads" / "XtraDB performance improvements for write-intensive high-concurrency workloads", or make the page contents correspond to URL/title by listing _all_ performance improvements in XtraDB.

Tags: doc Edit Tag help

Indeed the title is misleading, but the proposed correction is not fully correct neither: priority refill / innodb_empty_free_list_algorithm, thread scheduling priorities, and priority mutexes apply for highly-concurrent I/O-bound RO workloads as well to RW ones. The sync preflush changes are RW-only.

How about "XtraDB Performance Improvements for I/O-Bound Highly-Concurrent Workloads"?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers