[DOC] Misleading title for write-intensive optimizations page in the manual

Bug #1243067 reported by Alexey Kopytov on 2013-10-22
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Percona Server moved to https://jira.percona.com/projects/PS
Fix Released
Hrvoje Matijakovic
Fix Released
Hrvoje Matijakovic

Bug Description

http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/5.6/performance/xtradb_performance_improvements.html (both URL and title) makes the impression that optimizations listed on that page are the only performance improvements in XtraDB. Which is obviously false.

Either fix the URL and the title to something like "write_intensive_workloads" / "XtraDB performance improvements for write-intensive high-concurrency workloads", or make the page contents correspond to URL/title by listing _all_ performance improvements in XtraDB.

Tags: doc Edit Tag help

Related branches

Indeed the title is misleading, but the proposed correction is not fully correct neither: priority refill / innodb_empty_free_list_algorithm, thread scheduling priorities, and priority mutexes apply for highly-concurrent I/O-bound RO workloads as well to RW ones. The sync preflush changes are RW-only.

How about "XtraDB Performance Improvements for I/O-Bound Highly-Concurrent Workloads"?

Percona now uses JIRA for bug reports so this bug report is migrated to: https://jira.percona.com/browse/PS-1443

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers