Investigate how to handle processes that (pratically) never handle to SIGTERM
Bug #1353159 reported by
Raphael Isemann
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal |
Confirmed
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
As discussed here we don't send SIGKILL and we hang on SIGTERM if the process doesn't want to respond [1].
Things to think about:
* How should we react?
* How should this presented to the user?
[1] https:/
| Changed in pantheon-terminal: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
To post a comment you must log in.
