| 2015-11-05 00:23:58 |
Linette Williams |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2015-11-05 00:27:33 |
Linette Williams |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Olga Gusarenko |
| 2015-11-05 00:27:55 |
Linette Williams |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Anne Gentle |
| 2015-11-05 00:30:00 |
Linette Williams |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Lana |
| 2015-11-05 00:45:06 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link on this new page to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new page with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-05 02:05:51 |
Alexandra Settle |
openstack-manuals: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2015-11-05 14:44:47 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
- are the keywords being used to drive users into valuable "entry points", when applicable
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-05 14:46:44 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
- are the keywords being used to drive users into valuable "entry points", when applicable
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
- identify valuable "entry points" in content, if applicable..
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-06 17:06:28 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. It might be helpful to have one file covering some simple considerations, such as:
- avoid ambiguous titles
- drive high value keywords into titles, abstract
- identify valuable "entry points" in content, if applicable..
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool...
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a new topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on key words. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value key words in their titles, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-06 17:09:10 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on key words. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value key words in their titles, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-06 17:09:58 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, h1, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-06 18:42:50 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Run text through spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, h1, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Use spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, h1, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-16 22:24:18 |
Linette Williams |
removed subscriber Anne Gentle |
|
|
|
| 2015-11-16 22:24:19 |
Linette Williams |
removed subscriber Lana |
|
|
|
| 2015-11-16 22:24:23 |
Linette Williams |
removed subscriber Olga Gusarenko |
|
|
|
| 2015-11-16 22:28:01 |
Linette Williams |
description |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Use spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
We could also add a small section to touch on keywords. Maybe an introduction to help contributors think about high value keywords in their titles, h1, URL. This helps get users to the right content. Also, help contributors of larger, new sections think about their key landing pages. Landing pages are the files where these small SEO considerations can help keep users in the content (lower bounce rates).
It looks like there used to be (?) a tool within docs to test SEO results, maybe add a link to that type of tool... or links to other resources.
If the core team/others agree, I'll take a stab at a brief topic with really simple considerations. If I've missed something that already exists, please let me know that too.
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
I noticed that we don't give recommendations or considerations for titles, keywords, etc... to improve SEO results for new contributors. To promote successful SEO, I recommend adding the following best practices (with examples) to the writing style section.
- Avoid ambiguous titles
- Use consistent terminology
- Use spelling and grammar checking tools, if possible (primarily for larger, new topics)
- Be concise and clear (maybe move the "follow principles of minimalism" title into the description and make Be concise and clear the title?)
These simple guidelines make a big difference in SEO.
This bug only applies to the writing style section.
For future development, but not part of this bug, could consider a new bug to handle more in depth information.
-----------------------------------
Release: 1.0.0 on 2015-11-04 23:07
SHA: c2532135e3ba42937bc96e20581e51cc22fa5a73
Source: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/contributor-guide/source/writing-style.rst
URL: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/writing-style.html |
|
| 2015-11-17 17:14:56 |
OpenStack Infra |
openstack-manuals: status |
Confirmed |
In Progress |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:31:59 |
OpenStack Infra |
openstack-manuals: status |
In Progress |
Fix Released |
|
