Instructions for setting variables in security role are incorrect
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| openstack-ansible |
High
|
Major Hayden | ||
| Liberty |
High
|
Major Hayden | ||
| Mitaka |
High
|
Major Hayden |
Bug Description
The security role has variables in dictionary format for handling certain things, like auditd rules. The docs show examples like this:
auditd_
But they don't work properly. The only way to make it work is to copy the entire YAML dictionary into user_variables.yml and adjust it there.
Thanks to Jacob Wagner for reporting this one!
Changed in openstack-ansible: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → High |
assignee: | nobody → Major Hayden (rackerhacker) |
Changed in openstack-ansible: | |
milestone: | none → newton-1 |
Changed in openstack-ansible: | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Reviewed: https:/
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master
commit f5061fd0222cd06
Author: Major Hayden <email address hidden>
Date: Thu May 5 08:32:32 2016 -0500
Switch from dict to individual variables
The dictionary-based variables didn't work properly and this patch
changes them to individual variables. If users followed the existing
documentation, their environments will be unaffected by this change
(they are still broken).
The new variables follow the pattern `security_
will soon become the standard for the role to avoid variable name
collisions with other playbooks and roles.
Release notes are included with this patch.
Closes-bug: 1577944
Change-Id: I455f66a0b4f423
Changed in openstack-ansible: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to openstack-ansible-security (stable/mitaka) | #3 |
Fix proposed to branch: stable/mitaka
Review: https:/
Fix proposed to branch: liberty
Review: https:/
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Change abandoned on openstack-ansible-security (stable/mitaka) | #5 |
Change abandoned by Major Hayden (<email address hidden>) on branch: stable/mitaka
Review: https:/
Reason: Going to try to make this a clean backport.
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Change abandoned on openstack-ansible-security (liberty) | #6 |
Change abandoned by Major Hayden (<email address hidden>) on branch: liberty
Review: https:/
Reason: Going to try to make this a clean backport.
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to openstack-ansible-security (stable/mitaka) | #7 |
Fix proposed to branch: stable/mitaka
Review: https:/
Fix proposed to branch: liberty
Review: https:/
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to openstack-ansible-security (stable/mitaka) | #9 |
Reviewed: https:/
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: stable/mitaka
commit e2b39907d6123d9
Author: Major Hayden <email address hidden>
Date: Thu May 5 08:32:32 2016 -0500
Switch from dict to individual variables
The dictionary-based variables didn't work properly and this patch
changes them to individual variables. If users followed the existing
documentation, their environments will be unaffected by this change
(they are still broken).
The new variables follow the pattern `security_
will soon become the standard for the role to avoid variable name
collisions with other playbooks and roles.
Release notes are included with this patch.
Closes-bug: 1577944
Change-Id: I455f66a0b4f423
(cherry picked from commit f5061fd0222cd06
Reviewed: https:/
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: liberty
commit b5cdff790779797
Author: Major Hayden <email address hidden>
Date: Thu May 5 08:32:32 2016 -0500
Switch from dict to individual variables
The dictionary-based variables didn't work properly and this patch
changes them to individual variables. If users followed the existing
documentation, their environments will be unaffected by this change
(they are still broken).
The new variables follow the pattern `security_
will soon become the standard for the role to avoid variable name
collisions with other playbooks and roles.
Release notes are included with this patch.
Closes-bug: 1577944
Change-Id: I455f66a0b4f423
(cherry picked from commit f5061fd0222cd06
Doug Hellmann (doug-hellmann) wrote : Fix included in openstack/openstack-ansible-security 12.0.13 | #11 |
This issue was fixed in the openstack/
Davanum Srinivas (DIMS) (dims-v) wrote : Fix included in openstack/openstack-ansible-security 13.1.2 | #12 |
This issue was fixed in the openstack/
This issue was fixed in the openstack/
Fix proposed to branch: master /review. openstack. org/312506
Review: https:/