| 2010-04-07 14:11:10 |
Numérigraphe |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2010-04-13 11:39:39 |
Numérigraphe |
nominated for series |
|
openobject-server/trunk |
|
| 2010-07-10 11:41:15 |
Jay Vora (Serpent Consulting Services) |
openobject-server: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
| 2010-07-12 07:33:54 |
Numérigraphe |
description |
Answers for Question #106692 indicate that for the moment we can't do a "SELECT DISTINCT" using the ORM.
There are cases where this would be useful (like searching the order ids in order lines), so I propose we add a new parameter "distinct=False" to the search() method of th OSVs.
When set to True, it would return distinct tuples only.
It seems easy to add in osv using a SELECT DISTINCT statement.
It may be a bit more tricky in osv_memory, and it will run slower of course, and none sane will use it there I suppose, so we should just throw a "not implemented" exception I guess.
Lionel |
Answers for Question #106692 indicate that for the moment we can't do a "SELECT DISTINCT" using the ORM.
There are cases where this would be useful (like searching the order ids in order lines), so I propose we add a new parameter "distinct=False" to the read() method of th OSVs.
When set to True, it would return distinct tuples only.
It seems easy to add in osv using a SELECT DISTINCT statement.
It may be a bit more tricky in osv_memory, and it will run slower of course, and none sane will use it there I suppose, so we should just throw a "not implemented" exception I guess.
Lionel |
|
| 2010-07-12 07:34:15 |
Numérigraphe |
description |
Answers for Question #106692 indicate that for the moment we can't do a "SELECT DISTINCT" using the ORM.
There are cases where this would be useful (like searching the order ids in order lines), so I propose we add a new parameter "distinct=False" to the read() method of th OSVs.
When set to True, it would return distinct tuples only.
It seems easy to add in osv using a SELECT DISTINCT statement.
It may be a bit more tricky in osv_memory, and it will run slower of course, and none sane will use it there I suppose, so we should just throw a "not implemented" exception I guess.
Lionel |
Answers for Question #106692 indicate that for the moment we can't do a "SELECT DISTINCT" using the ORM : see https://answers.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+question/106692
There are cases where this would be useful (like searching the order ids in order lines), so I propose we add a new parameter "distinct=False" to the read() method of th OSVs.
When set to True, it would return distinct tuples only.
It seems easy to add in osv using a SELECT DISTINCT statement.
It may be a bit more tricky in osv_memory, and it will run slower of course, and none sane will use it there I suppose, so we should just throw a "not implemented" exception I guess.
Lionel
|
|
| 2010-11-23 23:51:03 |
Olivier Dony (Odoo) |
openobject-server: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2010-11-23 23:51:03 |
Olivier Dony (Odoo) |
openobject-server: assignee |
|
OpenERP's Framework R&D (openerp-dev-framework) |
|
| 2014-04-14 13:08:31 |
Lionel Sausin - Initiatives/Numérigraphe |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Lionel Sausin - Numérigraphe |
| 2014-04-14 13:08:38 |
Numérigraphe |
removed subscriber Numérigraphe |
|
|
|
| 2014-04-14 13:38:28 |
Mohamed Fadhel Hadj Salem |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mohamed Fadhel Hadj Salem |
