| 2013-01-27 22:09:49 |
Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2013-01-27 22:10:11 |
Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp |
description |
I can connect to a 6.1 instance with oobjlib 2.0.1 but not to a 7.0 instance:
I get the following stack trace
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 47, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(server=server, port=port)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 36, in __init__
self.server_version = self._sock.db('server_version').split('.')
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 106, in <lambda>
return lambda *args, **kwargs: self.send((name,) + args, **kwargs)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 76, in send
res = self.recv()
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 90, in recv
size = int(read(self.sock, 8))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '<head>\n<'
It looks like both ends are speaking a different protocol.
I see there is work being done on the dev branch to support net rpc. It would be very nice to have a 2.2 release for this available on pypi.
Thanks for your time and work on free software. |
I can connect to a 6.1 instance with oobjlib 2.1 but not to a 7.0 instance:
I get the following stack trace
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 47, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(server=server, port=port)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 36, in __init__
self.server_version = self._sock.db('server_version').split('.')
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 106, in <lambda>
return lambda *args, **kwargs: self.send((name,) + args, **kwargs)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 76, in send
res = self.recv()
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 90, in recv
size = int(read(self.sock, 8))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '<head>\n<'
It looks like both ends are speaking a different protocol.
I see there is work being done on the dev branch to support net rpc. It would be very nice to have a 2.2 release for this available on pypi.
Thanks for your time and work on free software. |
|
| 2013-03-12 06:17:14 |
Amit Parik |
openobject-addons: status |
New |
Triaged |
|
| 2013-04-03 09:47:27 |
Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp |
bug task added |
|
openobject-library |
|
| 2013-04-03 09:47:48 |
Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp |
bug task deleted |
openobject-addons |
|
|
| 2013-04-03 09:48:12 |
Alexandre Fayolle - camptocamp |
description |
I can connect to a 6.1 instance with oobjlib 2.1 but not to a 7.0 instance:
I get the following stack trace
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 47, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(server=server, port=port)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 36, in __init__
self.server_version = self._sock.db('server_version').split('.')
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 106, in <lambda>
return lambda *args, **kwargs: self.send((name,) + args, **kwargs)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 76, in send
res = self.recv()
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 90, in recv
size = int(read(self.sock, 8))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '<head>\n<'
It looks like both ends are speaking a different protocol.
I see there is work being done on the dev branch to support net rpc. It would be very nice to have a 2.2 release for this available on pypi.
Thanks for your time and work on free software. |
I can connect to a 6.1 instance with oobjlib 2.0.1 but not to a 7.0 instance:
I get the following stack trace
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 47, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(server=server, port=port)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/connection.py", line 36, in __init__
self.server_version = self._sock.db('server_version').split('.')
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 106, in <lambda>
return lambda *args, **kwargs: self.send((name,) + args, **kwargs)
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 76, in send
res = self.recv()
File "base_config/eggs/openobject_library-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/oobjlib/netrpclib.py", line 90, in recv
size = int(read(self.sock, 8))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '<head>\n<'
It looks like both ends are speaking a different protocol.
I see there is work being done on the dev branch to support net rpc. It would be very nice to have a 2.2 release for this available on pypi.
Thanks for your time and work on free software. |
|
| 2013-04-26 07:05:55 |
Christophe CHAUVET |
openobject-library: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2013-04-26 07:05:59 |
Christophe CHAUVET |
openobject-library: assignee |
|
Christophe Chauvet - http://www.syleam.fr/ (christophe-chauvet) |
|
| 2013-04-26 07:11:02 |
Christophe CHAUVET |
openobject-library: milestone |
|
3.0 |
|
| 2013-09-29 07:50:19 |
Christophe CHAUVET |
openobject-library: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
