Activity log for bug #1275464

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2014-02-02 14:38:13 Lionel Sausin - Initiatives/Numérigraphe bug added bug
2014-02-02 14:38:40 Lionel Sausin - Initiatives/Numérigraphe description I noticed something weird in the code of Account Budget Lines. It seems like no-op proxy functions have been introduced in this revision ages ago : revid:jvo@tinyerp.com-20080925130210-bmi3uuq26zit9ke3 Here is the first (the other read mostly the same): def _prac(self, cr, uid, ids, name, args, context=None): res={} for line in self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context): res[line.id] = self._prac_amt(cr, uid, [line.id], context=context)[line.id] return res Am I missing something, is this just return exact same value as _prac_amt in a totally inefficient way? Using browse() to get the ids is strange. And it's just rebuilding a dictionary it already has isn't it? I noticed something weird in the code of Account Budget Lines. It seems like no-op proxy functions have been introduced in this revision ages ago : revid:jvo@tinyerp.com-20080925130210-bmi3uuq26zit9ke3 Here is the first (the other read mostly the same):     def _prac(self, cr, uid, ids, name, args, context=None):         res={}         for line in self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context):             res[line.id] = self._prac_amt(cr, uid, [line.id], context=context)[line.id]         return res Am I missing something, or is this just returning the exact same value as _prac_amt in a totally inefficient way? Using browse() to get the ids is strange. And it's just rebuilding a dictionary it already has isn't it?
2014-02-02 14:40:06 Lionel Sausin - Initiatives/Numérigraphe bug added subscriber Jay Vora (Serpent Consulting Services)