Decide how to handle empty 100a field in MARC records
Bug #524117 reported by
Edward Betts
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open Library |
Confirmed
|
Medium
|
Edward Betts |
Bug Description
Some MARC records have an 100a field which is blank. All such records have been added to the same author. This is a mistake.
Changed in openlibrary: | |
assignee: | nobody → Edward Betts (edwardbetts) |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Confirmed |
tags: | added: marc |
To post a comment you must log in.
If we decided that Title, Author, Publisher and Publish Date were the absolute minimum metadata we'd accept for any imports, would that help? We could simply throw any records that didn't meet those requirements on the floor.