restore backlinks plugin

Bug #165027 reported by Aaron Swartz
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Open Library
Confirmed
Wishlist
Anand Chitipothu

Bug Description

backlinks got lost in the move to tdb; bring them back.

Revision history for this message
Anand Chitipothu (anandology) wrote : Re: [Bug 165027] restore backlinks plugin

On 25-Nov-07, at 10:23 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Public bug reported:
>
> backlinks got lost in the move to tdb; bring them back.

Not really. They are still there.

http://infogami.org/dev/InstallGuide?m=backlinks

Need to find out why it is not working properly on OL.

Revision history for this message
Aaron Swartz (aaronsw) wrote :

moving to OL because it's just broken there

Changed in infogami:
assignee: nobody → anandology
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Anand Chitipothu (anandology) wrote : Re: [Bug 165027] Re: restore backlinks plugin

Should backlinks work for every type of page or only for pages of
type type/page?

If they have to work for every type of page, then how should we
compute backlinks?

Revision history for this message
Aaron Swartz (aaronsw) wrote :

> Should backlinks work for every type of page or only for pages of
> type type/page?
>
> If they have to work for every type of page, then how should we
> compute backlinks?

Do we have a datatype for wiki-markup (i.e. Markdown + wikilinks)? If
so, we should just look for links in that. If not, maybe we should
consider that. If we decide against that, then let's just do it for
type/page (as the linker -- you should be able to request backlinks on
any page but it will only show you links from things of type/page,
right?).

Revision history for this message
Anand Chitipothu (anandology) wrote :

On 26-Nov-07, at 11:18 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

>> Should backlinks work for every type of page or only for pages of
>> type type/page?
>>
>> If they have to work for every type of page, then how should we
>> compute backlinks?
>
> Do we have a datatype for wiki-markup (i.e. Markdown + wikilinks)? If
> so, we should just look for links in that. If not, maybe we should
> consider that.

We don't have a datatype for wiki markup. Probably we should have a
type type/wikitext and backlinks should find in all properties of
type type/wikitext.

> If we decide against that, then let's just do it for
> type/page (as the linker -- you should be able to request backlinks on
> any page but it will only show you links from things of type/page,
> right?).

OK.

Revision history for this message
Edward Betts (edwardbetts) wrote :

http://openlibrary.org/?m=backlinks says "internal server error"

Revision history for this message
Edward Betts (edwardbetts) wrote :

I'd like to see backlinks on Open Library.

Changed in openlibrary:
importance: Low → Medium
Revision history for this message
Edward Betts (edwardbetts) wrote :

backlink code is in infogami/plugins/links it uses tdb, it needs to be rewritten for infobase

Revision history for this message
Anand Chitipothu (anandology) wrote :

I don't think that is a priority now. Moving to wishlist.

Changed in openlibrary:
importance: Medium → Wishlist
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.