lbaas v2 healthmonitor on different port

Bug #1678274 reported by Phil
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
octavia
New
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

This is not a bug. It is a fetaure request.

LBaaS v2 healthmonitors currently perform checks against the members' protocol port which handles normal traffic.

I would like the ability to configure a healthmonitor to perform checks against a different port.

Use cases:

1) An application exposes multiple ports to load balance, but a health check endpoint is only exposed over one of them. For example, an application exposes one HTTP port, and one TCP port with a custom protocol. listeners/pools/members are created to load balance each port. The application exposes a health check endpoint on the HTTP port at a certain URL path. I would like the ability to configure a health monitor for the TCP port to use the health checks exposed by the HTTP port.

2) An application exposes one "public" port to load balance, and another "admin" port that is not-load balanced. The health checks are only exposed on the "admin" port. I would like the ability to configure the health monitor for the public load balanced port to use the health check endpoint exposed on the admin port.

Tags: rfe
Phil (philsttr)
tags: added: rfe
affects: neutron → octavia
tags: removed: healthmonitor lbaas
Changed in octavia:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Michael Johnson (johnsom) wrote :

This appears to be a duplicate to an existing RFE, marking duplicate.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.