[RFE] Can't specify an error type on LBaaS objects that fail to provision

Bug #1585266 reported by Matthew Geldert
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
octavia
Triaged
Wishlist
Brandon Logan

Bug Description

LBaaSv2 objects have a provisioning_status field that can indicate when provisioning has failed, but there is no way to describe to the user what the error was. The ability to specify an error message as a parameter to the BaseManagerMixin.failed_completion() function that can then be returned in "show" calls to the object would save users and administrators a lot of time when debugging issues.

Revision history for this message
Carl Baldwin (carl-baldwin) wrote :

Assigning to Brandon to triage because I don't know a lot about lbaas.

tags: removed: errors lbaasv2
Changed in neutron:
assignee: nobody → Brandon Logan (brandon-logan)
Revision history for this message
Brandon Logan (brandon-logan) wrote :

This actually something v1 had that v2 does not have and probably would be something useful. In v1 I believe it was called status_description. I'll add the rfe tag because this is an rfe.

tags: added: rfe
Changed in neutron:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Changed in neutron:
status: New → Confirmed
summary: - Can't specify an error type on LBaaS objects that fail to provision
+ [RFE] Can't specify an error type on LBaaS objects that fail to
+ provision
Revision history for this message
Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote :

A description field may be useful but the degree of usefulness depends on the level of details provided. I am not sure that short description will save *a lot* of time when debugging, but it can definitely provide clues to where to look.

Changed in neutron:
status: Confirmed → Triaged
status: Triaged → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote :

This seems nice to have, but I wonder if the LBaaS/Octavia team would like to prioritize this.

Revision history for this message
Brandon Logan (brandon-logan) wrote :

We talked a bit yesterday about it in the octavia meeting. Everyone agreed it'd be great to have but I didn't get the sense that it would be a higher priority over the other high priorities. That was just the feeling I got though, and also my opinion that it's not a higher priority.

Revision history for this message
Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote :

Brandon, thanks. Let's keep it on the backburner for now.

Changed in neutron:
status: Confirmed → Triaged
tags: added: rfe-postponed
removed: rfe
affects: neutron → octavia
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers