Hi Jv, On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Jv wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > No problems. Branched Simone's three times for different reasons/tests. All > builds succeed. Building with VS 2012 Express edition for Windows Desktop > since it will be required by you later, I guess. No, that won't be required and won't even work I'm afraid. First, NUnit V2 will never be built for .NET 4.5. That's what 3.0 is for. Second, what we are trying to test here is whether NUnit V2, built for .NET 2.0, can run tests built for .NET 4.5, which use async. Simone has used reflection to do it and has not used any 4.5 features. Of course, to test this, we need Tests built for .NET 4.5 but NUnit has to be built as normally. Will the Express edition allow targeting .NET 2.0 when you build NUnit? Charlie > I am working on the await scenarios, in an independent project file, but > with the .core dlls built of Simone's branch. > > My contribution, here, I guess will be to provide you with help examples > for the wiki and if something comes up related to the tests, will post it > here! > > A question though. Is it necessary for the Test method to be marked Async? > Since await returns a Task, can there be a scenario for the NUnit test > method to not be Async ? > > Thanks, > > Jv > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Charlie Poole wrote: > >> Hi Jv, >> >> You have to pull and build Simone's branch from source in order to be >> able to work on this at all. As I remember from some previous work >> you did, you were unable to do that on your machine. Is that still >> a problem for you? >> >> Charlie >> >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jv wrote: >> > Hi Charlie, >> > >> > 1. Will start with the scenarios outlined by you plus some of my own. >> Maybe >> > they could feature in the help section. >> > >> > 2. Waiting for the merge to happen or can NUnit GUI work with Simone's >> > commit? >> > >> > Because I also want to test the GCConcurrent (for previous .net versions) >> > and serverGc (for .net 4.5) element and this can be done only through the >> > App config file. I guess this is more important due to it being the new >> > feature in .Net 4.5. >> > >> > 3. The unmanaged aspect to it, where the above configuration settings can >> > be overridden by the requesting app.What happens in the test (this is >> not a >> > question) when the config settings can be overridden by a call to >> > IsServerGC call from the unmanaged app. Is this consideration important? >> > And to complicate things further, some processor.architectures are not >> > supported. >> > >> > I am not sure if this should be documented as a known issue in NUnit or >> > should NUnit provide a hint when the Async tests are run or executed? >> > >> > 4. The SynchronizationContext and the AsynchronizationContext can be >> quite >> > tricky when GcCocurrent and ServerGC elements can both be used. Please >> > comment on this with reference to #2 above. >> > >> > Jv >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Charlie Poole wrote: >> > >> >> Sounds good! One thing we need is a test assembly built in VS2012, >> >> which contains all sorts of combinations of test features, for example, >> >> test cases that use an async method, methods with timeout plus async, >> >> methods using testcasesource, etc. The existing NUnit tests have lots >> >> of examples but of course none of them can use async. >> >> >> >> This is actually something that would help us implement async tests >> >> in all three projects... NUnit V2, NUnit 3.0 and NUnitLite >> >> >> >> Charlie >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Jv wrote: >> >> > Sure, Charlie, but this particular problem does require more than one >> >> > person I thought and hence suggested to help. I will try to >> independently >> >> > simulate some similar async scenarios and then seek help on how it >> can be >> >> > merged with Simone's work. >> >> > >> >> > Jv >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Charlie Poole >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Jv, >> >> >> >> >> >> You should coordinate with Simone on this, since he has the >> >> >> bug assigned. OTOH, there are tons of things to do other >> >> >> than this if you want something of your own! >> >> >> >> >> >> Charlie >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Jv >> wrote: >> >> >> > Since I am fairly free, I can work on this issue independently as a >> >> >> > spike. Please point me to the appropriate files in NUnit v2. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I will be working on finding if the async threads' context can be >> >> >> > independently established. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > This will help in maintaining that tests "await"-ing a async >> result is >> >> >> > testing the right context and will also help in establishing the >> >> "void" >> >> >> > context. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Jv >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to >> NUnit >> >> >> > Extended Testing Platform. >> >> >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057981 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Title: >> >> >> > C#5 async tests are not supported >> >> >> > >> >> >> > To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> >> >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1057981/+subscriptions >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit >> >> >> Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. >> >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057981 >> >> >> >> >> >> Title: >> >> >> C#5 async tests are not supported >> >> >> >> >> >> Status in NUnit Test Framework: >> >> >> Triaged >> >> >> Status in NUnitLite Testing Framework: >> >> >> Triaged >> >> >> Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: >> >> >> In Progress >> >> >> >> >> >> Bug description: >> >> >> If a method is marked async, nunit does not recognise it as a test, >> >> >> and some test runners may incorrectly pass it while it is still >> >> >> running. These methods actually return a Task not void, and the >> test >> >> >> can only be passed if the task completes without a failure. >> >> >> >> >> >> As detailed here >> >> http://anthonysteele.co.uk/async-and-await-with-nunit >> >> >> >> >> >> MSTest supports async tests >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/03/13/what-s-new-for-mstest-unit-tests-in-visual-studio-11-beta.aspx >> >> >> >> >> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1057981/+subscriptions >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Regards, >> >> > >> >> > Ravichandran Jv >> >> > http://ravichandranjv.blogspot.com >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to NUnit >> >> > Extended Testing Platform. >> >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057981 >> >> > >> >> > Title: >> >> > C#5 async tests are not supported >> >> > >> >> > To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1057981/+subscriptions >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit >> >> Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057981 >> >> >> >> Title: >> >> C#5 async tests are not supported >> >> >> >> Status in NUnit Test Framework: >> >> Triaged >> >> Status in NUnitLite Testing Framework: >> >> Triaged >> >> Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: >> >> In Progress >> >> >> >> Bug description: >> >> If a method is marked async, nunit does not recognise it as a test, >> >> and some test runners may incorrectly pass it while it is still >> >> running. These methods actually return a Task not void, and the test >> >> can only be passed if the task completes without a failure. >> >> >> >> As detailed here >> http://anthonysteele.co.uk/async-and-await-with-nunit >> >> >> >> MSTest supports async tests >> >> >> >> >> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/03/13/what-s-new-for-mstest-unit-tests-in-visual-studio-11-beta.aspx >> >> >> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1057981/+subscriptions >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > >> > Ravichandran Jv >> > http://ravichandranjv.blogspot.com >> > >> > -- >> > You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit >> > Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057981 >> > >> > Title: >> > C#5 async tests are not supported >> > >> > Status in NUnit Test Framework: >> > Triaged >> > Status in NUnitLite Testing Framework: >> > Triaged >> > Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: >> > In Progress >> > >> > Bug description: >> > If a method is marked async, nunit does not recognise it as a test, >> > and some test runners may incorrectly pass it while it is still >> > running. These methods actually return a Task not void, and the test >> > can only be passed if the task completes without a failure. >> > >> > As detailed here http://anthonysteele.co.uk/async-and-await-with-nunit >> > >> > MSTest supports async tests >> > >> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/03/13/what-s-new-for-mstest-unit-tests-in-visual-studio-11-beta.aspx >> > >> > To manage notifications about this bug go to: >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1057981/+subscriptions >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core >> > Post to :