Activity log for bug #1893284

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2020-08-27 23:34:33 melanie witt bug added bug
2020-08-27 23:38:00 melanie witt summary Per-user quotas not scoped correctly when creating or restoring a server Per-user quotas not scoped correctly when creating a server
2020-08-27 23:38:12 melanie witt description While looking into an issue reported on the ML [1] around per-user quotas not working properly, I found a bug where quota checking is not scoped correctly when creating or restoring a server. This causes per-user quota limits not to be honored during these API requests. The problem is in a utility function we use for checking quota when creating or restoring servers: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/f521f4dbace0e35bedd089369da6f6969da5ca32/nova/compute/utils.py#L1104-L1120 The Quotas.check_deltas method needs a user_id keyword arg in order to scope a quota check to a particular user. However, when we call check_num_instances_quota we don't pass a project_id or user_id because at the time of the quota check, we have not yet created an instance record and thus will not use that to determine the appropriate project and user. Instead, we should rely on the RequestContext.project_id and RequestContext.user_id as defaults in this case, but check_num_instances_quota only defaults project_id and not user_id. check_num_instances_quota should also default user_id to the RequestContext.user_id when user_id is not explicitly passed. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016861.html While looking into an issue reported on the ML [1] around per-user quotas not working properly, I found a bug where quota checking is not scoped correctly when creating a server. This causes per-user quota limits not to be honored during these API requests. The problem is in a utility function we use for checking quota when creating or restoring servers: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/f521f4dbace0e35bedd089369da6f6969da5ca32/nova/compute/utils.py#L1104-L1120 The Quotas.check_deltas method needs a user_id keyword arg in order to scope a quota check to a particular user. However, when we call check_num_instances_quota we don't pass a project_id or user_id because at the time of the quota check, we have not yet created an instance record and thus will not use that to determine the appropriate project and user. Instead, we should rely on the RequestContext.project_id and RequestContext.user_id as defaults in this case, but check_num_instances_quota only defaults project_id and not user_id. check_num_instances_quota should also default user_id to the RequestContext.user_id when user_id is not explicitly passed. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016861.html
2020-08-27 23:38:23 melanie witt description While looking into an issue reported on the ML [1] around per-user quotas not working properly, I found a bug where quota checking is not scoped correctly when creating a server. This causes per-user quota limits not to be honored during these API requests. The problem is in a utility function we use for checking quota when creating or restoring servers: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/f521f4dbace0e35bedd089369da6f6969da5ca32/nova/compute/utils.py#L1104-L1120 The Quotas.check_deltas method needs a user_id keyword arg in order to scope a quota check to a particular user. However, when we call check_num_instances_quota we don't pass a project_id or user_id because at the time of the quota check, we have not yet created an instance record and thus will not use that to determine the appropriate project and user. Instead, we should rely on the RequestContext.project_id and RequestContext.user_id as defaults in this case, but check_num_instances_quota only defaults project_id and not user_id. check_num_instances_quota should also default user_id to the RequestContext.user_id when user_id is not explicitly passed. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016861.html While looking into an issue reported on the ML [1] around per-user quotas not working properly, I found a bug where quota checking is not scoped correctly when creating a server. This causes per-user quota limits not to be honored during these API requests. The problem is in a utility function we use for checking quota when creating servers: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/f521f4dbace0e35bedd089369da6f6969da5ca32/nova/compute/utils.py#L1104-L1120 The Quotas.check_deltas method needs a user_id keyword arg in order to scope a quota check to a particular user. However, when we call check_num_instances_quota we don't pass a project_id or user_id because at the time of the quota check, we have not yet created an instance record and thus will not use that to determine the appropriate project and user. Instead, we should rely on the RequestContext.project_id and RequestContext.user_id as defaults in this case, but check_num_instances_quota only defaults project_id and not user_id. check_num_instances_quota should also default user_id to the RequestContext.user_id when user_id is not explicitly passed. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016861.html
2020-08-27 23:39:48 OpenStack Infra nova: status New In Progress
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/stein
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/stein
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/queens
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/queens
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/train
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/train
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/pike
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/pike
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/ussuri
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/ussuri
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt nominated for series nova/rocky
2020-08-27 23:43:54 melanie witt bug task added nova/rocky
2020-08-27 23:56:17 melanie witt nova: importance Medium Low
2020-08-27 23:56:31 melanie witt nova/pike: importance Undecided Low
2020-08-27 23:56:34 melanie witt nova/queens: importance Undecided Low
2020-08-27 23:56:36 melanie witt nova/rocky: importance Undecided Low
2020-08-27 23:56:38 melanie witt nova/stein: importance Undecided Low
2020-08-27 23:56:40 melanie witt nova/train: importance Undecided Low
2020-08-27 23:56:44 melanie witt nova/ussuri: importance Undecided Low
2020-09-11 12:31:42 OpenStack Infra nova: status In Progress Fix Released
2021-02-23 20:28:31 melanie witt nova/ussuri: status New In Progress
2021-02-23 20:28:31 melanie witt nova/ussuri: assignee melanie witt (melwitt)
2021-04-13 11:54:11 Elod Illes nova/ussuri: status In Progress Fix Released