Not existing pool can be passed to floating_ip_bulk

[Haiwei Xu]

Default floating-ip-pool only contains 'public'

$ nova floating-ip-pool-list
+--------+
| name |
+--------+
| public |
+--------+

But when creating new floating-ip-bulk with '--pool' option which does not exist, the pool can be set successfully.

$ nova floating-ip-bulk-create 192.0.50.0/25 --pool private

| - | 192.0.50.1 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.2 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.3 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.4 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.5 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.6 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.7 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.8 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.9 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.10 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.11 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.12 | - | private | eth0 |
| - | 192.0.50.13 | - | private | eth0 |

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/125915

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Change abandoned by Sean Dague (<email address hidden>) on branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/125915
Reason: This review is > 4 weeks without comment, and failed Jenkins the last time it was checked. We are abandoning this for now. Feel free to reactivate the review by pressing the restore button and leaving a 'recheck' comment to get fresh test results.

[Joe Gordon (jogo)]

patch was abandoned, not in progress anymore

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/139556

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Change abandoned by Amandeep (<email address hidden>) on branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/139556

[Davanum Srinivas (DIMS) (dims-v)]

Removing "In Progress" status and assignee as change is abandoned.

[dnovosel (dnovosel)]

I'm not sure this is a bug. If the pool doesn't exist it is created with the name provided using the pool flag. What's wrong with this approach? As far as I know there is no other mechanism to create a pool.

[dnovosel (dnovosel)]

Why was this moved to confirmed from in progress? I have a fix that works [although some test cases still fail, but I can fix these].

All that said, as I stated previously, I don't think this is a bug. What forum is the correct one to discuss this?

[Markus Zoeller (markus_z) (mzoeller)]

The age and number of assignee changes suggest that this isn't really
a low-hanging-fruit. I'm removing the tag to not confuse new folks who
are searching for that tag.

[Sujitha (sujitha-neti)]

There are no open reviews for this bug report since a long time.
I'm changing the status from "In Progress" to "New"
(as it was never confirmed. It was just moved from InProgress to Confirmed)
and remove the assignee.
Feel free to add yourself as assignee and push a review for it.

[Sean Dague (sdague)]

This is part of nova-net that is now deprecated. We probably won't fix bugs like these.