159 migration doesn't change shadow table

Bug #1179507 reported by Boris Pavlovic
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OpenStack Compute (nova)
Fix Released
Boris Pavlovic
Nominated for Grizzly by Boris Pavlovic

Bug Description

159 migration should be made for shadow table also

Tags: db
Changed in nova:
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Boris Pavlovic (boris-42)
milestone: none → havana-1
tags: added: db
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to nova (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/28959

Changed in nova:
status: New → In Progress
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Changed in nova:
milestone: havana-1 → havana-2
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to nova (master)

Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/28959
Committed: http://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/3718d3907893f43951781ae345ba0680479437f3
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master

commit 3718d3907893f43951781ae345ba0680479437f3
Author: Boris Pavlovic <email address hidden>
Date: Mon May 13 17:36:10 2013 +0400

    Sync shadow table for 159 migration

    To be able to use db archiving our table and shadow table should
    have the same columns.

    fixes bug 1179507

    Change-Id: Ia8a0271505d374456a9ff14d314e80af9bad4a2b

Changed in nova:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Changed in nova:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Changed in nova:
milestone: havana-2 → 2013.2
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Related blueprints

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.