changing the qos policy on a network does not change the placement allocation of the bound ports in the network
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
neutron |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Przemyslaw Szczerbik |
Bug Description
1) create a network with qos policy (with min_bw rule)
2) create a port in that network without explicit qos policy (so the port inherits the policy from the network)
3) boot a server with that port
4) update the qos policy on the network
Expected either:
A)
* qos policy change is accepted
* the port resource request is updated according to the new qos policy
* the placement allocation is updated according to the new qos policy
B)
* qos policy update is rejected
Actual:
* qos policy change is accepted -> OK as in A)
* the port resource request is updated according to the new qos policy -> OK as in A)
* the placement allocation is _not_ updated -> NOT OK in A)
See the specific reproduction steps with printouts in: http://
Changed in neutron: | |
assignee: | nobody → Lajos Katona (lajos-katona) |
Changed in neutron: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in neutron: | |
assignee: | Lajos Katona (lajos-katona) → Przemyslaw Szczerbik (pszczerbik) |
tags: | added: wallaby-backport-potential xena-backport-potential |
Please note that the above scenario is relevant also for the case when there are more than one bound port exists in the network.